리소스
패션 제품 개발의 모든 단계를 위한 실용적인 가이드를 만나보세요. 기획과 디자인 리뷰부터 생산, 세일즈까지, 팀이 바로 활용할 수 있는 팁과 노하우를 찾아보세요.
8 articles in 워크플로우 팁
Ask a fashion team why they’re looking at 3D collaboration tools and the answer is rarely about 3D. It’s about the Tuesday a vendor built a sample from the version that got superseded on Monday, or the review meeting where three people had three different files open, all named FINAL. The 3D garment was fine. The collaboration around it had nowhere to live. The tools that fix this are not
The pitch for 3D sampling usually overshoots. Somebody demos a garment rotating in a browser and the conclusion lands as “we can stop making samples,” which isn’t true and sets the project up to be judged against a promise it can’t keep. The defensible version of the argument is narrower: some of your sample rounds exist to answer questions that don’t require fabric. Those are the rounds 3D takes,
By the time a pre-production sample arrives, the interesting decisions are over. The silhouette was settled at proto. The fit was settled two rounds ago. What’s left is the dullest and most expensive question in the whole calendar: can this factory, on this line, with these materials, make this garment correctly, over and over? Approve it and bulk fabric gets cut. Approve it carelessly and you
A fit sample lands on the desk. Someone photographs it against a white wall, drops four images into an email, and writes "shoulder looks off." Three days later the vendor replies asking which shoulder, the merchandiser has forwarded an older photo to the buyer, and the pattern maker is holding a correction nobody approved. Nobody was careless. The review had nowhere to live. TL;DR A digital
A tech pack exists because a factory can't sew what it can't read. It's the document that turns a design into instructions: what the garment looks like, how it measures in every size, what it's made of, and how it ships. When a sample comes back wrong, the cause is almost always in this document. A measurement that lived only in someone's head, a trim that was discussed in chat but never written
A 3D garment starts as one file. Then comes a colorway variation, a fit revision, a vendor copy, a render for the sales team, and within a season one style has become fifteen files spread across email threads, shared drives, and someone's desktop. If your team works in 3D, file chaos isn't a storage problem. It slows down every review, and sooner or later, someone sews a sample from the wrong
If a vendor has ever cut a sample from an outdated tech pack, you already know that figuring out whose fault it was is beside the point. As long as your specs live scattered across email attachments, Excel sheets, and chat threads, the same mistake will happen again. You can muscle through it with ten styles a season. At several dozen styles and three rounds of revisions, it stops being a
Most product teams create a tech pack after the design is finished. But what if your tech pack could grow naturally alongside your 3D garment instead? A tech pack can be generated automatically from a 3D garment: when patterns, materials, measurements, and colorways are defined during design, that data becomes the tech pack, with no separate documentation step required. Here's how that workflow
